Jim Carrey Online

Posted: **Tue Apr 29, 2008 9:03 pm**

I think these pictures are timebound to the 80's/90's and that explains the clothing/tans etc.....re the dog, Steven DID have some wee dogs....
remember it's a true story so it's entirely possible that the producers had photos to base their reality on. I don't think they are camping it up any more than the reality of Miami beach circa that period in time.

fluffy :wink:

Posted: **Tue Apr 29, 2008 10:35 pm**

lmao..............hehe...check out the cuban heels on the Kid Creole get-up.......lol.....Jim's gotta be pushing 6ft 6"...... :lol:

fluffy

Posted: **Wed Apr 30, 2008 2:18 am**

grinchy steve wrote:I'm not judging in the way you put it. Hey, if you see these pics, it's not exactly looking like the realistic movie I was hoping for, isn't it? Thát's my dissapointment. I was hoping for a movie without all those stereotypes in it and when I see these first pictures, what do we get? Indeed.

So am I judging the movie? Nope. I still has the chance to be one hell of a funny ride.

Oh ok I see what you mean. I just assumed they are dressed like that cause thats the way people dressed in the 80's. So I am not really sure if it is supposed to be funny.

Ty for the pics Anna

Posted: **Wed Apr 30, 2008 7:23 am**

Big Photos:

The Article:

http://www.dlisted.com/node/25579

Posted: **Wed Apr 30, 2008 7:31 am**

http://socialitelife.celebuzz.com/image ... 908-02.php
Jim did n't touch the ass, if you noticed this!
I'm in agreement with Cotton!
You can not base your idea with only 7 photos! :roll:

If you already spoken so having seen pictures ... what do you when you see the movie?
:wink:

Posted: **Wed Apr 30, 2008 8:07 am**

You can rolleye as much as you want and I can repeat as much as I want that nobody is judging the movie based on those pictures.

Why don't we both get over it then?