Page 1 of 1

Number 23 comes in at 90....

PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 7:18 pm
by Happygal
As the worst of the worst!

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/features/ ... id=1168260

This really saddens me. :(

PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 7:27 pm
by Lena
ts they can put there lists where the sun don't shine.
I love the movie!

PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 7:32 pm
by Happygal
I know! I seen something on TV, where they said The Number 23 came in at number 2 as the top 5 worst movies! This was also by Rotten Tomatoes. But I don't care what they say, I'm still going to watch it when it comes out on DVD. :)

PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 11:23 pm
by sprousefan23
Well rotten tomatoes don't know what their talking about! The Number 23 was good, and no stupid list is gonna change my mind!

:D

PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 3:31 am
by carreypunkrawker
sorry but I agree with Rotten Tomatoes. It could have been way better than it turned out. But the only movie that's really at the worst of the worst was Me, Myself & Irene. That one really sucked.

PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 4:36 am
by lammy
Didn't dumb and dumber come out after " Me , myself and Irene " ?

:lol:

PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 3:39 pm
by carreypunkrawker
no. Dumb and DUmber came out before MM&I.

PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 4:52 pm
by alisonsarah
I was thinking that maybe they wrote that article because they're not used to seeing Jim in this sort of role. What do you all think?